Science and Medicine

Gulf Oil Spill’s Vastness Confirmed: Largest Marine Oil Accident Ever



The researchers used high-resolution video clips of flow from the Deepwater Horizon well to measure volume. (Credit: Courtesy US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works)

BP’s leaking oil well in the Gulf of Mexico was conclusively sealed this week, but even now, questions remain about the amount of oil that actually came out of it. Initially after the April 20 explosion, officials claimed that the flow could not be measured. Then, as public pressure for information mounted, they looked for ways to measure it, and started producing estimates: at first, 1,000 barrels a day; then 5,000; then 12,000 to 19,000; then upward from there. Now, in the first independent, peer-reviewed paper on the leak’s volume, scientists have affirmed heightened estimates of what is now acknowledged as the largest marine oil accident ever.

Using a new technique to analyze underwater video of the well riser, they say it leaked some 56,000 to 68,000 barrels daily—maybe more—until the first effective cap was installed on July 15. Their estimate of the total oil escaped into the open ocean is some 4.4 million barrels—close to the most recent consensus of government advisors, whose methods have not been detailed publicly.

The paper appears in this week’s early online edition of the journal Science.

“We wanted to do an independent estimate because people had the sense that the numbers out there were not necessarily accurate,” said lead author Timothy Crone, a marine geophysicist at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. After BP and government officials downplayed the possibility or importance of measurements, a wide spectrum of scientists, environmental groups and legal experts pointed out that the information was needed to determine both short- and long-term responses, and monetary liability.

Read more: Gulf Oil Spill’s Vastness Confirmed: Largest Marine Oil Accident Ever

No comments
 

Investigators Find that Salmonella Creates Environment for Growth



Discovery one day may help scientists develop ways to control this common food poisoning cause.

A study led by researchers at UC Davis has found how the bacteria Salmonella enterica—a common cause of food poisoning—exploits immune response in the human gut to enhance its own reproductive and transmission success. The strategy gives Salmonella a growth advantage over the beneficial bacteria that normally are present in the intestinal tract and promotes the severe diarrhea that spreads the bacteria to other people.

The study, “Gut inflammation provides a respiratory electron acceptor for Salmonella,” is published in the Sept. 23 issue of the journal Nature.

“The human body normally has 10 times more microbes than human cells that help protect us against infection from disease-causing bacteria,” said Andreas Bäumler, professor of medical microbiology and immunology at the UC Davis School of Medicine and the principal investigator of the study. “We have discovered Salmonella’s cunning trick that allows it to quickly take over and outgrow the beneficial microbes in our intestine.”

All bacteria must generate energy in order to live and reproduce, either by respiration—which usually requires oxygen—or fermentation. Because essentially no oxygen is available in our intestines, the beneficial bacteria that reside there tend to use fermentation, which is less efficient than respiration for obtaining energy.

Read more: Investigators Find that Salmonella Creates Environment for Growth

No comments
   

Scientists Develop Method for Determining Diet of our Early Ancestors



“The bigger the tooth, the bigger area for chips to develop and, therefore, the more force the animal can produce.”

Were our early mammalian ancestors vegetarians, vegans, or omnivores. It’s difficult for anthropologists to determine the diet of early mammalians because current fossil analysis provides too little information. But a new method that measures the size of chips in tooth fossils can help determine the kinds of foods these early humans consumed.

Professor Herzl Chai of Tel Aviv University’s School of Mechanical Engineering, in collaboration with scientists from George Washington University and the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has developed an equation for determining how the size of a chip found in the enamel of a tooth relates to the bite force needed to produce the chip. With the aid of this information, researchers can better determine the type of food that animals, and early humans, could have consumed during their lifetimes.

Teeth are the only relevant fossils with staying power, Prof. Chai said. Made of hard, mineralized material, teeth from animals that are thousands of years old remain relatively intact. Teeth that display a greater number of large chips indicate that animals like our early ancestors were consuming harder foods such as nuts, seeds or items with bones. A lesser amount of small chips demonstrates that the animal’s diet more likely consisted of softer foods, such as vegetation. Prof. Chai’s findings were recently reported in the journal Biology Letters.

Read more: Scientists Develop Method for Determining Diet of our Early Ancestors

No comments
   

Page 47 of 52